Post by Ativan Prescribed on Mar 26, 2015 1:56:53 GMT 8
About placing values on emotions...
When we do that, if we spend to much of the values we place on certain emotions, we, in effect can become emotionally bankrupt.
Which is ridiculous if you think about it.
It is in placing more value on one emotion over another.
We either go all out spending the higher values on one, or we neglect to realize there is still the values left from the others.
Either way, the problem isn't the emotions, it is the value's that we as individuals place on them ourselves.
When others seem to still have value left in theirs, we tend to think of ours as being spent by simply using them.
Emotional values are something that we do to categorize various emotions, like having a top ten list so to speak.
In doing so, we lessen the apparent values of other emotions and neglect them or see them as having a negative value and tend to call them negative emotions.
Simply because we have used a system of values to judge emotions.
Take away those values and just look at the emotions for what they are, without attaching this system of values to them.
It is the values that change and we perceive having spent those values, which in turn puts priorities on one emotion over another.
Without this system of values, emotions become what they are.
There is never a lack of any emotion, there can be, however the perception that we have spent all of one, because we spent the value.
The problem is never the emotions, it is in the values.
We then have an emotional famine, simply because we placed unrealistic values on one emotion over another.
We spend the value, the emotions never change, just the perception that they have, because of the values we have placed on them.
A person can never be emotionally bankrupt if they don't use a system of values that determine an emotions worth.
You can spend and spend, but the emotions remain as they are, because there isn't such a thing as them having a value.
That value system is the frailty of humanity showing itself.
When in fact, there is no frailty, only a system that that has frailty built into it.
People see my depression as something bad, because they see me as having spent some value somewhere and all I am left with is depression as a result.
This isn't true, my depression is a state of mind, of emotions that is introspective in nature, or looking at the world with a different set of emotions.
The emotions that are not in use, are not spent, they are simply not being used.
Depression is a state of mind, it is not emotionally spent or the black hole of emotions.
It's something that I do with my emotions, I take drugs to counter the effects of this twisting of emotions that is uncomfortable and makes it hard to move forward like I think I should.
But it isn't because those other emotions are gone or spent or used up, it is simply that they are not being used in an efficient enough way for me to move forward like I would like to.
The sense of normal comes from that value system.
People work hard at keeping the value up for a set of emotions that they have an agreement with others as to the set amount of value one has with them to be considered normal.
If there wasn't this value system, people would stop looking down on disorders as if those people are bankrupt and therefore devoid of the same sets of emotions as they have.
The truth is, is that they have no right to judge these imaginary values of another person, just because they use an imaginary system of values for theirs.
That's what's going on with the forum, is that this imaginary system of abnormal values has been upset, and they are having doubts about not only their emotional values, but of others as well.
Placing values on emotions places some of them at the front of the line, while leaving other ones behind.
If they use those ones they deemed important because of that false sense of value, they don't see the other emotions, because they feel their apparent worth isn't there, so they feel emotionally spent.
Which you cannot do without that sense of values that places some as more important than others.
They all have their uses, and people tend to leave a lot of them on the back shelf, because they don't see them because of their relative worthlessness to them.
They are more concerned about getting the value of the ones they placed up front back, once they feel they have spent to much of that value.
Take away that idea that they have this kind of power over you because of a system of value and you no longer have less of any of them.
They are not a quantity that a value can be place on, they are a quality, and each one has it's own unique use.
When used in sets, we set the quality of our emotions depending on the current situation of life and live in the now, rather than being upset that we spent this imaginary value as if they are a quantity to be used up and then replenished.
That's simply not true and is an illusion that is perpetrated by those who have a problem dealing with their egos or self, in relationship to anothers.
They use emotions as if they are a competition and have to use them wisely so they are not all spent up and could be perceived as being in a 'negative' or deficit filled set of emotions, and because of this they set the bar or standard as to how much emotional values are necessary to be deemed 'normal'.
Take away that system of values and the problems that come from them disappear as well.
It isn't an emotional issue that the forum is having, it is a issue of values that each person has assigned to those emotions.
None are more, none are lacking.
It is only the values that are, more or less, in peoples perceptions.
Emotions are a quality, not a quantity. And it's in that idea that they are a quantity that is a problem.
Some people think others are using to much of that quantity of certain emotions and they don't think it is fair, because it changes the values of their quantity of emotions.
Once they settle down and become more reasonable, they will treat emotions more like a quality, rather than a quantity.
Some people have the idea that others have used to much of a quantity of 'perceived as negative' or deficit emotions, so they have to spend their positive emotion to counter the effect that simply isn't there, because of using them as a quantity, rather than the quality that they really are.
The problems that society places on everything, because of the rise of the barter system, which is simplified by using money, so therefore, everything has its value.
Emotions don't, it is a perceived notion, and that's why people are bent out of shape, it's because of others, that they feel like their emotional values are being used up or the value of them has changed because of others.
It's an unrealistic way of going through life, but it is deeply ingrained into our psyche, to such an extent, that my depression falls below the bar they have set.
But by not subscribing to such ingrained bullshit as that value system, I am simply using a set of emotions in a way that I want to change, and can through the use of drugs and therapy by talking about them.
When I talk to my therapist about such things, I tell them to stop placing these preconceived notions of value on how I am feeling and ask them instead, to help me find the reason(s) i am using them in a set that is uncomfortable to me, but has nothing to do with others.
As it is not theirs to make a value judgement on them to begin with.
I use my depression as an example, but what has happened in the forum, is value judgments of others emotions, based on the values they have placed on theirs.
It isn't an emotional problem that is going on, it is a problem with these perceived values and their apparent worth.
Stop using value as a way to gauge emotions and instead gauge their quality instead, it makes it one helluva lot easier to understand others when you do this.
While this value system is heavily ingrained into our psyche, it is to anyone's advantage to let go of that and see the emotions for their qualities and not their apparent value.
Emotions are a quality, and there is never a lack of any of them. If there is never a lack, then valuing them as a quantity fails as a way to understand not only yours, but others as well.
Ativan
When we do that, if we spend to much of the values we place on certain emotions, we, in effect can become emotionally bankrupt.
Which is ridiculous if you think about it.
It is in placing more value on one emotion over another.
We either go all out spending the higher values on one, or we neglect to realize there is still the values left from the others.
Either way, the problem isn't the emotions, it is the value's that we as individuals place on them ourselves.
When others seem to still have value left in theirs, we tend to think of ours as being spent by simply using them.
Emotional values are something that we do to categorize various emotions, like having a top ten list so to speak.
In doing so, we lessen the apparent values of other emotions and neglect them or see them as having a negative value and tend to call them negative emotions.
Simply because we have used a system of values to judge emotions.
Take away those values and just look at the emotions for what they are, without attaching this system of values to them.
It is the values that change and we perceive having spent those values, which in turn puts priorities on one emotion over another.
Without this system of values, emotions become what they are.
There is never a lack of any emotion, there can be, however the perception that we have spent all of one, because we spent the value.
The problem is never the emotions, it is in the values.
We then have an emotional famine, simply because we placed unrealistic values on one emotion over another.
We spend the value, the emotions never change, just the perception that they have, because of the values we have placed on them.
A person can never be emotionally bankrupt if they don't use a system of values that determine an emotions worth.
You can spend and spend, but the emotions remain as they are, because there isn't such a thing as them having a value.
That value system is the frailty of humanity showing itself.
When in fact, there is no frailty, only a system that that has frailty built into it.
People see my depression as something bad, because they see me as having spent some value somewhere and all I am left with is depression as a result.
This isn't true, my depression is a state of mind, of emotions that is introspective in nature, or looking at the world with a different set of emotions.
The emotions that are not in use, are not spent, they are simply not being used.
Depression is a state of mind, it is not emotionally spent or the black hole of emotions.
It's something that I do with my emotions, I take drugs to counter the effects of this twisting of emotions that is uncomfortable and makes it hard to move forward like I think I should.
But it isn't because those other emotions are gone or spent or used up, it is simply that they are not being used in an efficient enough way for me to move forward like I would like to.
The sense of normal comes from that value system.
People work hard at keeping the value up for a set of emotions that they have an agreement with others as to the set amount of value one has with them to be considered normal.
If there wasn't this value system, people would stop looking down on disorders as if those people are bankrupt and therefore devoid of the same sets of emotions as they have.
The truth is, is that they have no right to judge these imaginary values of another person, just because they use an imaginary system of values for theirs.
That's what's going on with the forum, is that this imaginary system of abnormal values has been upset, and they are having doubts about not only their emotional values, but of others as well.
Placing values on emotions places some of them at the front of the line, while leaving other ones behind.
If they use those ones they deemed important because of that false sense of value, they don't see the other emotions, because they feel their apparent worth isn't there, so they feel emotionally spent.
Which you cannot do without that sense of values that places some as more important than others.
They all have their uses, and people tend to leave a lot of them on the back shelf, because they don't see them because of their relative worthlessness to them.
They are more concerned about getting the value of the ones they placed up front back, once they feel they have spent to much of that value.
Take away that idea that they have this kind of power over you because of a system of value and you no longer have less of any of them.
They are not a quantity that a value can be place on, they are a quality, and each one has it's own unique use.
When used in sets, we set the quality of our emotions depending on the current situation of life and live in the now, rather than being upset that we spent this imaginary value as if they are a quantity to be used up and then replenished.
That's simply not true and is an illusion that is perpetrated by those who have a problem dealing with their egos or self, in relationship to anothers.
They use emotions as if they are a competition and have to use them wisely so they are not all spent up and could be perceived as being in a 'negative' or deficit filled set of emotions, and because of this they set the bar or standard as to how much emotional values are necessary to be deemed 'normal'.
Take away that system of values and the problems that come from them disappear as well.
It isn't an emotional issue that the forum is having, it is a issue of values that each person has assigned to those emotions.
None are more, none are lacking.
It is only the values that are, more or less, in peoples perceptions.
Emotions are a quality, not a quantity. And it's in that idea that they are a quantity that is a problem.
Some people think others are using to much of that quantity of certain emotions and they don't think it is fair, because it changes the values of their quantity of emotions.
Once they settle down and become more reasonable, they will treat emotions more like a quality, rather than a quantity.
Some people have the idea that others have used to much of a quantity of 'perceived as negative' or deficit emotions, so they have to spend their positive emotion to counter the effect that simply isn't there, because of using them as a quantity, rather than the quality that they really are.
The problems that society places on everything, because of the rise of the barter system, which is simplified by using money, so therefore, everything has its value.
Emotions don't, it is a perceived notion, and that's why people are bent out of shape, it's because of others, that they feel like their emotional values are being used up or the value of them has changed because of others.
It's an unrealistic way of going through life, but it is deeply ingrained into our psyche, to such an extent, that my depression falls below the bar they have set.
But by not subscribing to such ingrained bullshit as that value system, I am simply using a set of emotions in a way that I want to change, and can through the use of drugs and therapy by talking about them.
When I talk to my therapist about such things, I tell them to stop placing these preconceived notions of value on how I am feeling and ask them instead, to help me find the reason(s) i am using them in a set that is uncomfortable to me, but has nothing to do with others.
As it is not theirs to make a value judgement on them to begin with.
I use my depression as an example, but what has happened in the forum, is value judgments of others emotions, based on the values they have placed on theirs.
It isn't an emotional problem that is going on, it is a problem with these perceived values and their apparent worth.
Stop using value as a way to gauge emotions and instead gauge their quality instead, it makes it one helluva lot easier to understand others when you do this.
While this value system is heavily ingrained into our psyche, it is to anyone's advantage to let go of that and see the emotions for their qualities and not their apparent value.
Emotions are a quality, and there is never a lack of any of them. If there is never a lack, then valuing them as a quantity fails as a way to understand not only yours, but others as well.
Ativan