Post by Ayla on Nov 6, 2015 12:44:15 GMT 8
The D.C. Office of Human Rights on Tuesday released the findings of a six-month study that showed 48 percent of employers appeared to prefer at least one less-qualified job applicant over a better-qualified applicant perceived as being transgender. The study involved sending 200 “test” cover letters and resumes prepared by OHR to 38 employers that advertised 50 individual job openings, according to an OHR statement. The statement says OHR sent two sets of cover letters and resumes to each of the advertised job openings from “applicants” who appeared to be transgender and another two sets from applicants who were portrayed as non-transgender. “The study is the first known government-conducted resume testing to focus on discrimination against transgender and gender non-conforming job applicants,” OHR said in its statement.
The report includes these findings:
Forty-eight percent of employers appeared to prefer “at least one less-qualified applicant perceived as cisgender (individuals who do not identify as transgender or gender non-conforming) over a more qualified applicant perceived as transgender.”
Thirty-three percent of employers offered interviews to one or more less-qualified applicants perceived as cisgender while they did not offer an interview to at least one of the better-qualified applicants perceived as transgender.
An applicant portrayed by OHR as a transgender man with work experience at a transgender advocacy organization “experienced the highest individual rate of discrimination” by employers responding to the test applications.
The restaurant industry had the “highest percentage of responses perceived as discriminatory among the employment sectors tested, although the sample numbers are low and therefore not conclusive.
www.washingtonblade.com/2015/11/04/sting-reveals-anti-trans-job-bias/
The report includes these findings:
Forty-eight percent of employers appeared to prefer “at least one less-qualified applicant perceived as cisgender (individuals who do not identify as transgender or gender non-conforming) over a more qualified applicant perceived as transgender.”
Thirty-three percent of employers offered interviews to one or more less-qualified applicants perceived as cisgender while they did not offer an interview to at least one of the better-qualified applicants perceived as transgender.
An applicant portrayed by OHR as a transgender man with work experience at a transgender advocacy organization “experienced the highest individual rate of discrimination” by employers responding to the test applications.
The restaurant industry had the “highest percentage of responses perceived as discriminatory among the employment sectors tested, although the sample numbers are low and therefore not conclusive.
www.washingtonblade.com/2015/11/04/sting-reveals-anti-trans-job-bias/